The face-off between President Jonathan and Mr. Sanusi
actually began in 2012 after Mr. Sanusi granted an interview considered
critical of the administration.
Contrary
to widespread believe that Central Bank Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi,
first ran into trouble with President Goodluck Jonathan late last year
when he wrote a letter accusing the Nigerian National Petroleum
Corporation of diverting N8 trillion of Nigeria’s oil revenue,
PREMIUM TIMES can report today that Mr. Sanusi first incurred the wrath
of the presidency in 2012 when he granted a newspaper interview
criticizing the administration’s handling of the Boko Haram insurgency.
Mr.
Sanusi had granted an interview to the Financial Times of London in
2012 blaming widespread poverty in the North for Boko Haram’s success in
recruiting members. That interview, this newspaper can report, terribly
irked Mr. Jonathan and earned Mr. Sanusi a query from the presidency.
Investigations
by PREMIUM TIMES showed that not long after it published Mr. Sansui’s
interview, the Financial Times did an analysis on Nigeria’s economy and
passed a damning verdict on the Federal Government.
Embarrassed
by both the interview and the analysis of the London-based newspaper,
President Jonathan ordered the former National Security Adviser, NSA,
late Owoye Andrew Azazi, to query Mr. Sanusi.
During the
controversial interview, the CBN governor had among other things,
criticised the uneven distribution of wealth in the country, saying some
parts of Nigeria were by far richer than others.
Mr. Sanusi had
while fielding questions said, “There is clearly a direct link between
the very uneven nature of distribution of resources and the rising level
of violence.
“When you look at the figures and look at the size
of the population in the north, you can see that there is a structural
imbalance of enormous proportions. Those states simply do not have
enough money to meet basic needs while some states have too much money.
“The imbalance is so stark because the state still depends on oil for more than 80 per cent of its revenues.”
However,
in its analysis of Mr. Sanusi’s interview, the Financial Times on
January 27, 2012 wrote: “Nigeria has made little headway raising taxes
for example from agriculture, which accounts for 42 per cent of GDP.
Northern Nigeria’s economy has traditionally depended on the government
more than the south.
“Many of the industries set up as part of
earlier efforts to promote national balance have gone bust or been sold
off during a decade of liberal market reforms, power shortages and
infrastructure collapse.”
The analysis continued, “According to
official figures, the leading oil producing state, Rivers, received N1,
053 billion between 1999 and 2008 in federal allocations.
“By
contrast the North-eastern states of Yobe and Borno, where the Boko
Haram sect was created, received N175bn and N213bn respectively. Broken
down on a per capita basis, the contrast is even starker.
In 2008 the 18.97m people who lived in the six states in the north-east received on average N1, 156 per person.”
But
a few days after the analysis was published and following presidential
directive, Mr. Azazi issued a query to Mr. Sanusi, dated February 2,
2012.
A copy of the query which was exclusively obtained by
PREMIUM TIMES, referenced: NSA/A/229/C and titled, “Recent Interview
with Financial Times,” was copied to the Director General, Department of
State Services, Ita Ekpenyong.
Among other things, the NSA
stated that the query was necessitated by statements credited to Mr.
Sanus during an interview with the London-based newspaper.
The
query reads, “In the interview, you were alleged to have made statements
to the following effects: That, the uneven pattern of distribution of
resources is directly linked to the rising level of violence in Nigeria.
“That,
it is now necessary to focus funds on regenerating other regions of
Nigeria; other than the Niger Delta. That, additional federal funds
allocation to the Niger delta states has created ‘a structural imbalance
of enormous proportions,’ with some states not having enough money and
others having too much.
“That, when the theft of oil by
profiteers is considered, this imbalance between the oil producing
states of the South-South (or Niger Delta states) and states in the
North is compounded.”
The query also drew Mr. Sanusi’s attention
to his statement that the derivation funds paid to oil producing states,
above the normal federal allocations created new disparity in state
resource, fostered resentment and encouraged terrorism.
The CBN
governor was also reminded that his assertions directly attributed the
activities of Boko Haram sect to the revenue allocation formula used by
the government.
The query continued, “Not only is there no
empirical evidence to support such a statement, conventional wisdom in
Nigeria refutes that assertion. Experts obviously have provided numerous
explanations for the emergence of Boko Haram activities and the general
consensus is that there are no silver bullets.
“Your statements
to the Financial Times do not only have no basis in fact but they are
divisive, inflammatory, inciting and inappropriate of a senior officer
of the Federal Government whose responsibility includes national
stability and state continuity.
“This statement has already
caused a lot of angst among the populace and raised significant
questions as to your intent and motives. These statements bring
disrepute to the administration and current and past leadership of
Nigeria.
“While I understand your right to free speech and some
of the independence your office enjoys, I must also caution you that as
an officer of the Government of Nigeria and one entrusted to promote
state stability, your utterances through this interview are not in the
interest of Nigeria’s national security.
“I encourage you to
explore and pursue approaches that will ameliorate the problems that
your statements have caused, including a retraction or clarifying
statements, possibly through the same medium of interview.”
PREMIUM
TIMES learnt that Mr. Sanusi failed to respond to the query, saying he
was not answerable to Mr. Azazi and that he would only respond to a
direct query from President Jonathan.
Presidency sources say the
President did not forgive Mr. Sanusi ever since and had waited patiently
for an opportunity to unload him from the administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment